Get a Free Originality Report


Get a Free Originality Report

Case Study 1: Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803)

Our papers are 100% unique and written following academic standards and provided requirements. Get perfect grades by consistently using our writing services. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Rely on us and be on schedule! With our help, you'll never have to worry about deadlines again. Take advantage of our current 20% discount by using the coupon code GET20

Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

In 1803, the Supreme Court, led by
Chief Justice John Marshall, decides the landmark case of William Marbury versus
James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States and confirms the legal
principle of judicial review–the ability of the Supreme Court to limit
Congressional power by declaring legislation unconstitutional–in the new nation.

Analyze the following case in
preparation to answer the questions that follow a systematic approach to your
synthesis of law and fact. The final work product is a legal memorandum that
articulates whether judicial review is still vital to the power of the Supreme
Court which is to be presented to members of a judicial tribunal.

Review the following

Write an eight to ten (8-10) page
paper in which you:

  1. Prepare a two to three (2-3) page
    briefing on the case that you reviewed in which you utilize the following areas
    of importance: a) issue presented; b) short answer; c) the facts of the case; d)
    a summary of the case; and e) a conclusion of the case outcome.
  2. Review the concept of judicial
    review, and explain the fundamental manner in which the Court obtained the power
    of judicial review.
  3. Interpret the following quote from
    Thomas Jefferson in a letter to W.C. Jarvis, dated Sept. 28, 1820: “It is very
    dangerous doctrine to consider the judges as the ultimate authority of all
    constitutional questions.” Provide a rationale for your
  4. Specify whether or not you believe
    Chief Justice John Marshall’s claim of the power of judicial review for the
    judicial branch constituted a usurpation of power.
  5. Review the Court’s decision in
    Marbury and determine
    whether the Court acted in any fashion in order to improve the system of checks
    and balances that exits among the branches of government.
  6. Use at least two (2) quality
    references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality
    as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these
formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times
    New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and
    references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor
    for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the
    title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course
    title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in
    the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment

  • Illustrate the workings of the
    adversary system.
  • Analyze the functions of law and
    identify various types of law.
  • Use technology and information
    resources to research issues in U.S. Courts.
  • Write clearly and concisely about
    U.S. Courts using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.

We offer the best essay writing services to students who value great quality at a fair price. Let us exceed your expectations if you need help with this or a different assignment. Get your paper completed by a writing expert today. Nice to meet you! Want 15% OFF your first order? Use Promo Code: FIRST15. Place your order in a few easy steps. It will take you less than 5 minutes. Click one of the buttons below.

Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order